Financial DD

A financial analysis of the target is important. A buyer needs to be assured and understand which risks exist in the company. An asset (purchase) deal means that the historic legal responsibility is not transferred to the buyer. This can mean that the financial due diligence is shorter or less extensive compared to a transaction where the shares are acquired. However, this doesn’t necessarily need to be the case in all circumstances. It is also very important to determine the value drivers of the financial performance and be assured that the future earnings of the company will be sustainable.


THE OBJECTIVES OF FINANCIAL DUE DILIGENCE

The due diligence process is much more than a standard checklist of procedures in order to provide approval for a proposed acquisition. When done properly, a financial due diligence review provides valuable information to support the proposed acquisition. There have been numerous examples where performing expert financial due diligence has saved the cost of a bad acquisition. Financial due diligence generally has the following objectives:



THE PHASES OF FINANCIAL DUE DILIGENCE (when start)

Given that financial due diligence can be a costly and time-consuming exercise, it is important to determine when the process should start. In general, this happens after the negotiations and an LOI (letter of intent) has been provided and signed. For a buyer, it is important that you know how many companies have performed financial due diligence. If there are many, you run a substantial risk that you will not end up as the final buyer and will have wasted your time and investment during the financial due diligence process. Hence, it is important to have exclusivity and an agreed LOI including the price and other conditions. Currently, in most M&A projects a VDR (virtual data room) is available. This gives buyers the opportunity to investigate the company with internal resources before deciding on costly external financial due diligence. Once an LOI has been drafted that describes the structure of the deal, financial due diligence should begin. Ample time and resources should be allocated to the financial due diligence process, as the outcome of the review can provide valuable information regarding a realistic purchase price. It can also help to get appropriate guarantees and provisions in place.


METHODS OF FINANCIAL DUE DILIGENCE

Financial due diligence can be performed via a variety of different methods. The most common methods are to perform an analysis of the financial statements, interviews with key employees, order forecasts, market and industry data, or analyses for benchmarking among other ways. There is no ideal case for financial due diligence. It is always a balance between quality, costs, and the level of desired information. It is important that financial due diligence is conducted by independent advisers or people that can give an independent opinion. This is crucial in order to have a financial due diligence report that gives a fair, open, and objective opinion. A financial due diligence review can be conducted either internally, by the acquirers’ own accounting and finance department, or by external independent due diligence experts. The benefit of using external advisers is that the review is based on an independent viewpoint from a party that has no direct interest in the outcome of the proposed transaction.


DELIVERABLES OR REPORTS INCLUDED IN FINANCIAL DUE DILIGENCE

The deliverables for a financial due diligence project can differ enormously. In general, it is good to have a report prepared. However, in practice, we see all kinds of activities being performed and reports being produced. Here are some of the contents of a standard financial due diligence report: